VFRworld

Welcome to VFRworld! Join thousands of Honda VFR owners from around the world discussing everything related to the beloved Honda Interceptor. Contribute to the message boards, post classifieds ads, upload photos, and more! Registration takes about 30 seconds - it's fast, easy, and absolutely free - Join VFRworld today!
Go Back   VFRworld > VFRworld Forums > VFR Interceptor Discussions > Modifications
Custom Search

ChatBox (No new messages since your last visit)
Loading...
Ask your questions in the forums. The ChatBox is for small talk. Lamps to everyone!
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2009, 08:46 AM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GreyVF750F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Online: 11-19-2009 11:07 AM
Location: West of Cleveland Ohio
My Ride: 1983 VF750F
View my Photo Gallery
Posts: 490
Thanks: 21
Thanked 60 Times in 46 Posts
I have to think that with those long intake tubes, you will not have much of a bottom end. Plus the response most likely will be slow until you get in to higher 6k or above rpms. Hope you kept the stock setup. You may just need it later.


__________________
GreyVF750F is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 11-07-2009, 09:51 AM   #32 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
donald branscom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Last Online: Yesterday 12:06 PM
Location: Guerneville CA
Posts: 184
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreyVF750F View Post
I have to think that with those long intake tubes, you will not have much of a bottom end. Plus the response most likely will be slow until you get in to higher 6k or above rpms. Hope you kept the stock setup. You may just need it later.
I make things happen.
Yes, I have the stock carbs if this plan does not work.
I learned that in the military....always have a 2nd way out.
donald branscom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 10:30 AM   #33 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
donald branscom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Last Online: Yesterday 12:06 PM
Location: Guerneville CA
Posts: 184
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Something I read recently....
"That depends on what your after? Long runner intakes are for the most part better used for low rpm operation, where as short runner intakes are better for high rpm operation. Thats really a super over simplication of the matter.

Intake runners are designed to take advantage of resonant tuning by using a series of pulses which occur in the manifold.
To get a rough idea of where the resonant tuning takes place determine the rpm at which the resonant tuning occurs using the approximations below. then compare them to the runner lengths.for example plug in 6000 rpm for each one

2nd Pulse Length: 108,000/rpm (18 inches)
3rd Pulse Length: 97,000/rpm (16 inches)
4th Pulse Length: 74,000/rpm (12 inches)
5th Pulse Length: 54,000/rpm ( 9 inches)"
donald branscom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 10:33 AM   #34 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
donald branscom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Last Online: Yesterday 12:06 PM
Location: Guerneville CA
Posts: 184
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
This looks interesting and very useful.
Now I just have to figure intake areas.
Intake Runner and Peak Torque Calculator
Click on link above.
donald branscom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 10:34 AM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
donald branscom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Last Online: Yesterday 12:06 PM
Location: Guerneville CA
Posts: 184
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Using the formulas given in the link above this is what I get.

Each intake is about 6 inches to the CYLINDER head.
The area of all 4 intakes is 484 sq. inches.(121 each) 1.625 diameter tubing.
So the peak torque would be at about 2,799 rpm.
The optimum length of intake tract at 6,000 rpm would NEED to be, (including length from carb to intake valve seat -14 inches. and right now the length is about 13 inches total from carb to intake valve seat. Very close, and this puts all the torque at about 5,000 rpm. not bad.

Last edited by donald branscom; 11-07-2009 at 11:19 AM.
donald branscom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 11:35 AM   #36 (permalink)
Member
 
VF1000RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Last Online: Today 04:10 AM
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
My Ride: 1986 Mutant VF1000R 1986 VF1000R 1984 VF1000F 1983 KATANA
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Couple things:

Handling is somewhat more important than maintainence access on a sporting bike, therefore the frame wrapped around the engine. Kinda curious to see how yours will handle.

Cruising speed of the engine? I don`t know. Depends on what you mean by cruising speed. I just got back from a run on my R and anywhere from 5k-7k depending on traffic, with blasts up to the 11k redline, roadspeed around 80 is a good cruising speed for mine.

Looks like an interesting project. I am curious how the intake runners length will affect the fueling. I don`t really have any issues working with the 4 stock carbs, but it`s interesting to see your work. Not much of a chopper fan, but the powerplant you`ve chosen is one of my favorites, and I like well put together machines, no matter what they are.
__________________
Tom
Mutant VF1000R

"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even
though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who
neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight
that knows not victory nor defeat."
VF1000RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 12:18 PM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
donald branscom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Last Online: Yesterday 12:06 PM
Location: Guerneville CA
Posts: 184
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by VF1000RS View Post
Couple things:

Handling is somewhat more important than maintainence access on a sporting bike, therefore the frame wrapped around the engine. Kinda curious to see how yours will handle.

Cruising speed of the engine? I don`t know. Depends on what you mean by cruising speed. I just got back from a run on my R and anywhere from 5k-7k depending on traffic, with blasts up to the 11k redline, roadspeed around 80 is a good cruising speed for mine.

Looks like an interesting project. I am curious how the intake runners length will affect the fueling. I don`t really have any issues working with the 4 stock carbs, but it`s interesting to see your work. Not much of a chopper fan, but the powerplant you`ve chosen is one of my favorites, and I like well put together machines, no matter what they are.
Choppers are all about the looks, the vibe any sport bike will handle way better than a chopper. This frame has 42º rake so at low speeds the handling has to be with care. On the freeway it will just glide along and feel very secure. I used to race motorcycles but this motorcycle is just to putt around on and be relaxed.
donald branscom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 03:03 PM   #38 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
donald branscom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Last Online: Yesterday 12:06 PM
Location: Guerneville CA
Posts: 184
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
OK!!!! The offset sprocket from Germany for my VF1000R just arrived and did not seem to get held up in customs. 7mm offset thats .270 thousandths or more than 1/4" but less than 3/8."
Now I can get those engine mounts welded into place.

donald branscom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 06:18 PM   #39 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GreyVF750F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Online: 11-19-2009 11:07 AM
Location: West of Cleveland Ohio
My Ride: 1983 VF750F
View my Photo Gallery
Posts: 490
Thanks: 21
Thanked 60 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by donald branscom View Post
Something I read recently....
"That depends on what your after? Long runner intakes are for the most part better used for low rpm operation, where as short runner intakes are better for high rpm operation. Thats really a super over simplication of the matter.
Where did you ever here this? That's totally backwards from everything I've read and done and experienced. Short runners and or small cross section intakes have a higher velocity in the lower mid rpm ranges. Longer runners work better at higher rpms and can also create a ram effect in some instances. Depending on a lot of shit.

Resonance tuning is a bit more complicated than just using formulas for pipe. You also have wet flow, cross section, velocity, over lap and how straight it is to the valve. Just for starters. You have quite a turn in the intake there. Plus you will not be able to get 100% volumetric efficiency. Not many stock vehicles can come close let alone racing engines. NA of coarse. Pressurized is a totally different animal.

But you'll have a fun time sorting this stuff out. If you really want to get in to this stuff and learn from some of the best engine builders in the US and other parts of the world go here and poke around and ask questions. These guys do it for the love (hehe) and pain of it. This has got to be one of the greatest sites for actually straight info on the web.

Speed Talk
__________________
GreyVF750F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 06:05 AM   #40 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
donald branscom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Last Online: Yesterday 12:06 PM
Location: Guerneville CA
Posts: 184
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreyVF750F View Post
Where did you ever here this? That's totally backwards from everything I've read and done and experienced. Short runners and or small cross section intakes have a higher velocity in the lower mid rpm ranges. Longer runners work better at higher rpms and can also create a ram effect in some instances. Depending on a lot of shit.

Resonance tuning is a bit more complicated than just using formulas for pipe. You also have wet flow, cross section, velocity, over lap and how straight it is to the valve. Just for starters. You have quite a turn in the intake there. Plus you will not be able to get 100% volumetric efficiency. Not many stock vehicles can come close let alone racing engines. NA of coarse. Pressurized is a totally different animal.

But you'll have a fun time sorting this stuff out. If you really want to get in to this stuff and learn from some of the best engine builders in the US and other parts of the world go here and poke around and ask questions. These guys do it for the love (hehe) and pain of it. This has got to be one of the greatest sites for actually straight info on the web.

Speed Talk
Thanks for the link to Speed talk.
donald branscom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 09:14 PM   #41 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Last Online: 11-17-2009 09:18 PM
Location: South Elgin, Illinois- about 35 miles west of Chicago
My Ride: 1986 VF1000R
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry bud,

A VF1000R Motor in a chopper frame??

Just wrong.... wrong......
Wrencher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 09:30 PM   #42 (permalink)
Banned
 
TOE CUTTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Last Online: Yesterday 09:47 PM
Location: Sacramento - Find Me!
My Ride: 2007 RWB 1990 RED 1986 750 DRZ 400
View my Photo Gallery
Posts: 1,338
Thanks: 75
Thanked 120 Times in 108 Posts
Want some?

Got a new Benjamin says he is just fine and will have to lean out the mixture.
__________________
Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves. Ronald Reagan
TOE CUTTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 07:50 AM   #43 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
donald branscom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Last Online: Yesterday 12:06 PM
Location: Guerneville CA
Posts: 184
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
There are lots of choppers built with metric engines.
Look at this one!
donald branscom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
85 VF1000R engine noise? ingebrit First & Second Generation 1983-1989 7 06-07-2009 02:19 PM
'85 VF500F Won't Start/ Engine Flood - Carb Problem? slippy First & Second Generation 1983-1989 0 07-05-2008 11:37 AM
Fuel injector/carb cleaner (was: Baseline carb setting for stock 94) Ed Kokosa VF/VFR Mailing List 3 04-09-2008 11:18 AM
Anyone need an engine or engine parts? Travis Gintz VF/VFR Mailing List 3 08-14-2007 01:08 PM
Engine parts Travis Gintz VF/VFR Mailing List 0 08-14-2007 12:54 PM


Disclaimer
Please note: VFRworld.com is not affiliated in any way with Honda Motor Company, Inc. The words Honda and VF/VFR are registered trademarks and/or names owned by Honda Motor Company, Inc. and are used on this Internet Website as reference only. This is an unofficial site and is solely for the enjoyment and use of everyone. Any reproduction or use of any of the content of this site is strictly encouraged. If that's not good enough and you still want to sue me - Go ahead! I have no money. All I have is my Viffer, and you will have to take that over my cold dead body!
Credits
vBulletin v3.7.0 ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBadvanced CMPS v2.2.1, Links Directory v2.0.0
Geek Article and Review System v1.0c
PhotoPost PHP v5.62, Classifieds v2.42
Red2Black v2.00

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5