Staintune High moutn 94-97 anyone?

Hey there listers, the spring bug has hit and I've decided to change the
sound of my bike. Does anyone out there have a high-mount staintune exhaust
for the 94-97 that they might be willing to part with? If you do please
shoot me an email off list at jboron1414@xxxxxx and let me know what
you would like to get for it. Thanks!

Jeremy


>From: vfr-request@xxxxxx
>Reply-To: vfr@xxxxxx
>To: vfr@xxxxxx
>Subject: Vfr Digest, Vol 25, Issue 1
>Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:54:52 -0600
>
>Send Vfr mailing list submissions to
> vfr@xxxxxx
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vfr
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> vfr-request@xxxxxx
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> vfr-owner@xxxxxx
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Vfr digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: high beam usage & chain lube (scott wingerter)
> 2. Re: Re: high beam usage (vfrlist@xxxxxx)
> 3. Re: VFR 750 Wingrack II? (Douglas Yee)
> 4. RE: high beam usage & chain lube (Brad Berson)
> 5. RE: high beam usage (Brad Berson)
> 6. The T.W.O. article... (J Richard Ronay)
> 7. most protective gloves & boots - generational blashemy
> (J Richard Ronay)
> 8. Lights, yada yada yada!!! (steve knecht)
> 9. RE: Gloves and Boots (Alan Wilson)
> 10. "Smokin' Joe" VTEC (Corbeau)
> 11. Re: high beam usage (John Alexander)
> 12. Re: high beam usage (Mickyc51@xxxxxx)
> 13. RE: high beam usage (Don Davis)
> 14. Re: high beam usage (Mickyc51@xxxxxx)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:44:48 -0500 (EST)
>From: scott wingerter
>Subject: Re: high beam usage & chain lube
>To: "fourmerly5@xxxxxx" , vfr@xxxxxx
>Message-ID:
> <33358999.1143855890387.JavaMail.root@xxxxxx-billy.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>Stock bulbs are 45W/45W. Same draw high or low beam. I've relaced them with
>55W/60W and run the high beams (60W) all the time in daylight and when
>appropriate at nite. No problem with batery discharge.
>
>Use Mobile 1 75W-90 Synthetic gear oil as a chain lube. Unbelievable chain
>life.
>
>-----Original Message-----
> >From: "fourmerly5@xxxxxx"
> >Sent: Mar 30, 2006 11:05 PM
> >To: vfr@xxxxxx
> >Subject: high beam usage & chain lube
> >
> >hi, all. would appreciate some input.
> >high beam usage:
> >i read someone's post awhile ago that suggested that vfr batteries (i
>have a 2000) will deplete pretty fast if one uses the high beams a great
>deal (i prefer to ride with high beams on during the day. sometimes, even
>at night...). is this true?
> >
> >chain lube:
> >i've been using 90-weight gear oil as the manual recommends. are there
>any other types of lubes that are more desirable on this bike?
> >
> >thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> >________________________________________________________________________
> >Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month!
> >Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage.
> >Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!
>
>
>________________________________________
>PeoplePC Online
>A better way to Internet
>http://www.peoplepc.com
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:58:09 -0500
>From:
>Subject: Re: Re: high beam usage
>To:
>Message-ID:
> <20060401015808.QISM15695.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@[172.18.180.8]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
>
>============================================================
>A couple of years ago I witnessed an accident caused by bright lights;
>A cube van was stopped waiting to make a right turn into a (temporarily
>blocked) driveway.
>A Harley behind the van decided to pull into the oncoming lane and pass the
>van, there was room.
>The woman (2 cars in front of me) immediately pulled to the right to miss
>the bike, even though there was a couple of hundred feet of clearance. She
>had been blinded by the high beams and driving lights of the motorcycle,
>and
>thought he was directly in front of her. She pulled over so abruptly she
>caught her rear bumper on the front bumper of a parked taxi, her bumper
>popped off and spun around into the path of the oncoming Harley. The Harley
>rider couldn't get stopped in time and mounted his front wheel on the
>bumper, and ended up doing a slow dismount to the left.
>No serious injuries, minor scratches to the Harley (which was eventually
>ridden away), Lady's car needed a new bumper, Taxi (well it was hard to
>tell, it was pretty rugged looking to begin with)
>The Harley rider was charged with several offences, including failing to
>dip
>his high beams....
>This happened on a bright sunny August, and took up my entire lunch hour.
>
>As a side note, my (ex) father in-law, took a $300 ticket for failing to
>dip
>his highs while riding his Aspencade (he had been warned), and a couple of
>days later took another ticket for alternating flashing brakes lights on
>the
>same bike. (he had been warned about that too). He switched to a Harley,
>and as far as I know has never been bothered since.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Vfr mailing list
>Vfr@xxxxxx
>For subscription and delivery options:
>https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vfr
>============================================================
>
>Are you actually trying to imply that this woman was blinded by the
>headlights, even high beams, of a motorcycle that was 200 feet away on a
>bright August day? IMPOSSIBLE! This lady just plain panicked.
>
>Even at night, total darkness, when an oncoming driver fails to dim his
>high beams you aren't blinded at 200 feet. During the day your pupils are
>open and becoming blinded by light is very difficult, especially at 200
>feet. At night when your pupils are larger it is much easier to become
>blinded by bright lights and it is still possible to see until the other
>vehicle is a lot closer than 200 feet.
>
>As for your (ex) father in law, seems to be his own stupidity that caused
>his problem by not heeding the warnings he had received. What state did
>this occur in? I'm sure listers in that state would like to know they could
>be cited for running their high beams during the day. This is assuming he
>received the ticket during the day and there were no other reasons to add
>this to another charge.
>
>As another aside, how many of us ride in groups? How many of those in the
>groups use their high beams? In the groups I've ridden in we ALL run our
>high beams and no one is blinded.
>
>Enough, I'm done. If you want to ride with your high beams on make sure
>it's legal where you live. Otherwise it's personal opinion.
>
>Let's ride...
>
>Bob in Tucson
>Then:
>90 VTR 250
>98 VFR 800
>03 CBR F4i
>
>Now:
>01 VFR 800
>04 Chevy Avalanche
>http://vifferman.tripod.com/vfr_album/
>
>http://www.frappr.com/?a=myfrappr&id=72717
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:28:23 -0800
>From: Douglas Yee
>Subject: Re: VFR 750 Wingrack II?
>To: harry.m1byt@xxxxxx
>Cc: vfr@xxxxxx
>Message-ID: <316456DB-C127-11DA-8DD8-0030657C73CE@xxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
>I never had a problem with this bolt during my trip to Laguna Seca, but
>I did
>carry several extra bolts with me just in case. Since then I haven't
>used
>them so no long term experience.
>
>One thought is to install the Y-100 cross brace. This is supposed to add
>some rigidity to the structure by connecting the sides of the Wingrack
>at/near
>the bottom. There was a thread back in 1997 discussing its merits:
>
>https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/vf...msg00521.shtml
>
>I couldn't find a picture of what it looks like installed, but here's a
>link
>to a picture showing you the parts in the kit:
>
>http://store.azmusa.com/winandwin.html
>
>Good luck.
>
>--douglas
>
>On Friday, Mar 31, 2006, at 14:48 US/Pacific, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
>
> > I wonder if anyone has found a satisfactory resolution to the problem
> > several people report of the Givi Wingrack snapping the 5mm bolts
> > which fix
> > it to the pillion pegs?
> >
> > Givi's adaptor kit for the rack replace the pins used as standard on
> > the
> > bike, with a couple of 5mm bolts and nuts. When loaded with luggage,
> > these
> > take a great deal of weight and strain. Far better would have been for
> > the
> > bracket to have mounted onto the same fixing on the pillion peg
> > bracket as
> > the exhaust. Anyone found a solution?
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:40:05 -0500
>From: "Brad Berson"
>Subject: RE: high beam usage & chain lube
>To:
>Message-ID:
>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> >> IOW, the point is indeed to be annoying!
> > No, it is not. The point is to be noticed.
>
>Tomato, tomatoe.
>
> > You've fallen into the same trap as the "loud pipes saves lives"
>crowd.
> > Thinking that your ignorant behaviour is making you a safer person.
>
>Not at all. But you've definitely fallen into the ASSume trap.
>
>I have the stock lamps and wiring. And stock pipes too, FWIW.
>
>-Brad
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:13:50 -0500
>From: "Brad Berson"
>Subject: RE: high beam usage
>To:
>Message-ID:
>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> > A Harley behind the van decided to pull into the oncoming
> > lane and pass the van, there was room.
>
>Am I the only one who sees something terribly, terribly wrong here?
>
>Do I even need to explain myself?
>
>Anyway, never mind that for a moment, I'm noticing that here in the
>'states, nobody gives a hoot about the high-beams as long as it's not
>after dusk, but elsewhere it seems to get more attention. Like I
>mentioned in a prior post, this IS an international list. We all have
>to be careful about our assumptions, and should take care not to imply
>that the standards we live by are the standards that everyone should
>live by.
>
> > He switched to a Harley, and as far as I know has
> > never been bothered since.
>
>So does that mean that it's OK to use the hi-beams on a Harley but not
>on a Honda?
>
>Yeah, I'm being a ballbuster, sorry.
>
>
>-Brad
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:39:19 -0500
>From: "J Richard Ronay"
>Subject: The T.W.O. article...
>To:
>Message-ID: <004401c6553d$df043a00$15314d0c@xxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>
>
>From: ALOHADREAM
>
> Guess which year VFR the writer/rider of the T.W.O. article liked the
>best? Drum roll, please.... the 1990 VFR750 / 3rd generation (or is
>that 2nd?) Uh oh, this could be trouble.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>I think we better hold on to our '90s, Bryan!
>
>
>Richard Ronay
>Southern Maryland
>'90 VFR
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/vfr...ttachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 7
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:52:00 -0500
>From: "J Richard Ronay"
>Subject: most protective gloves & boots - generational blashemy
>To:
>Message-ID: <009801c6553f$a3ea9c00$15314d0c@xxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: J Richard Ronay
>To: Jim Sherman
>Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 10:50 PM
>Subject: Re: most protective gloves & boots - generational blashemy
>
>
> >From Jim Sherman:
>
>The Daytona Security Evo - only $949.95
>
>Held KRYPTON GLOVES - only $249.95.
>
>Ouch!
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>
>
>Crikey! For that kind of folding you could probably get a 2nd gen VFR!
>
>
>Richard Ronay
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/vfr...ttachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 8
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:04:43 -0600
>From: "steve knecht"
>Subject: Lights, yada yada yada!!!
>To:
>Message-ID: <002301c65541$68a903a0$6401a8c0@xxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Michael, put on your big boy Underroo's and buck up.
>We are all in this together weather you or any one else here likes it.
>I find that most people I ask, don't give a F@%K about the headlights on
>your bike. They have more important shit to think about like where to eat,
>where are the kids, how late am I for my hair appnt.
>I for one love to see blazing lights on an oncoming bike, makes me sit up
>and survey the area more. (pulling me outta the fog of work)
>True there are no real studies on the benefits or harm that high beams have
>on the general populace's awareness factor, but hell if it pisses off one
>person enough to pull "head from ass" and notice a bike and not flatten
>him(or her) then I say good.
>I would like to know where the statement "the fact that it is annoying and
>rude to oncoming drivers" came from. I nor any of my family, friends,
>fellow riders find it annoying or rude, so how is this so called fact
>supported?
>I am not trying to be a Dick about this but your
>attitude just got my dander up and i had to put my quarter in the shit
>machine.
>
> Peace ,love, and good happiness stuff.
> Steven K. The CajunVFR
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/vfr...ttachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 9
>Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 07:43:38 -0500
>From: "Alan Wilson"
>Subject: RE: Gloves and Boots
>To:
>Message-ID:
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>As a wise, fast (but now very old, senile and direction-challenged) lister,
>Steve Donaldson told me: "When you're
>sliding down the road after a get-off, it's not the time you wish you had
>spent some extra $ on gloves and boots".
>Don't have a 'cheap attack' when buying protective gear. If it keeps you
>uninjured just once, it's worth it.
>
>Alan
>Columbus OH
>'95 VFR750
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 10
>Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 10:06:33 -0600
>From: "Corbeau"
>Subject: "Smokin' Joe" VTEC
>To: vfr@xxxxxx
>Message-ID: <20060401155822.M23314@xxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>You might have followed this on STN or VFRDiscussion.com...
>
>I went to start up my 2002 after its hibernation last week. Plugged the
>battery in, it started easily. Then, I smelled smoke. (30 seconds after
>start-
>up) And 15 seconds later, I *saw* smoke, coming from somewhere in the
>front.
>
>Dayum. I knew it wasn't oil on the heads, because I didn't put a tablespoon
>of
>oil in the cylinders. And it didn't smell like burning oil, anyway. (Which
>also ruled out oil spilled on the headers from the winterizing oil change)
>No,
>sir, it smelled of burnt rubber, which lead me to presume something
>electrical
>was frying.
>
>I started up the bike again, looking (and smelling) closely for smoke, and
>I
>confirmed it was not coming from the headers, but more behind the dash or
>something. I killed the engine after 60 seconds, because troubleshooting
>while
>waiting for flames is not my idea of fun.
>
>It was then time for some explorative surgery. I pulled the fairings off,
>the
>windscreen, the upper cowl. And, unpluggin the four headlights connectors,
>I
>found one that had started to melt, hot enough that it left two small marks
>on
>the rubber boot that's behind the bulb (LH main, btw, other three are
>fine.)
>
>Honda doesn't sell just the connector, but instead the front sub-harness,
>which has the connectors for everything that lights up in the front. And a
>few
>things that plug in the dash. C$98. I could probably find a connector that
>an
>H4 plugs into for much cheaper at an auto parts store.
>
>Which way should I go and is there more things I should check for?
>
>Corbeau
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 11
>Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 12:22:52 -0800
>From: "John Alexander"
>Subject: Re: high beam usage
>Cc: "VFR List (VFR List)"
>Message-ID:
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>On 3/31/06, Matt Fitzsimmons wrote:
> >
> >
> > >> The fact that it annoys oncoming drivers, on the other hand, is hard
>to
> > >> debate.
>
>
> > I see bikes all the times with hi-beams on and I've never thought
> > > twice about it. Nor did I think anything of it in my 10 years of
> > > driving prior to learning to ride a motorcycle.
>
>
>
>IIRC, and any listers there please chime in, the Indiana DMV recommends
>that
>motorcycle riders use their high-beams during daylight hours.
>
>Can I hear a "Hmmmmmmmmmm"? ;-)
>
>John in Calif
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/vfr...ttachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 12
>Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 15:38:28 EST
>From: Mickyc51@xxxxxx
>Subject: Re: high beam usage
>To: vfr@xxxxxx
>Message-ID: <365.102dd06.31603ec4@xxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>
>In a message dated 4/1/2006 3:23:32 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>johnmalexander@xxxxxx writes:
>
>IIRC, and any listers there please chime in, the Indiana DMV recommends
>that
> motorcycle riders use their high-beams during daylight hours.
>
>Can I hear a "Hmmmmmmmmmm"? ;-)
>
>
>
>
>It has been my experience in life that pretty much everyone is critical of
>the Govt, the DMV and any other rule making organization there is. Till
>they
>accidentally agree with one suggestion. Then the organization gets quoted
>as a
>leading authority.
> Am I being sarcastic? Yes.
> Am I telling the truth? Yes.
>
> Can I hear a "Hmmmmmmmmmm"?
>
>Micky Curry
>My wife is driving me to drink.
>I should probably thank her.
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/vfr...ttachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 13
>Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 15:40:49 -0500
>From: "Don Davis"
>Subject: RE: high beam usage
>To: "VFR Mailing List \(VFR Mailing List\)"
>Message-ID: <000601c655cc$8fe7a490$6501a8c0@xxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Chiming in to say, that is not the case here in Indiana... :)
>
>Don Davis
>99 VFR800
>99 VFR800
>01 Tie Fighter
>
> _____
>
>From: vfr-bounces@xxxxxx [mailto:vfr-bounces@xxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>John Alexander
>Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 3:23 PM
>Cc: VFR List (VFR List)
>Subject: Re: high beam usage
>
>
>IIRC, and any listers there please chime in, the Indiana DMV recommends
>that
>motorcycle riders use their high-beams during daylight hours.
>
>Can I hear a "Hmmmmmmmmmm"? ;-)
>
>John in Calif
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/vfr...ttachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 14
>Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 15:54:31 EST
>From: Mickyc51@xxxxxx
>Subject: Re: high beam usage
>To: vfr@xxxxxx
>Message-ID: <296.887bb3d.31604287@xxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>
>In a message dated 4/1/2006 3:41:33 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>d.davis@xxxxxx writes:
>
>Chiming in to say, that is not the case here in Indiana... :)
>
>
>
> What? Are you telling me I stepped away from my bill paying to rebut
>a
>statement that's not even true? I'm appalled. :-)
>
>Micky Curry
>My wife is driving me to drink.
>I should probably thank her.
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/vfr...ttachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Vfr mailing list Vfr@xxxxxx
>For subscription and delivery options:
>https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vfr
>
>End of Vfr Digest, Vol 25, Issue 1
>**********************************


_______________________________________________
Vfr mailing list
Vfr@xxxxxx
For subscription and delivery options:
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vfr

Jeremy,

There's one on ebay right now at
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...RK%3AMEWA%3AIT

There's also a group buying opportunity I read about on
www.vfrdiscussion.com . Apparently, the $455 pipe can be had for $375 new.
The details are on the discussion group at
http://www.vfrdiscussion.com/forum/i...2&hl=staintune

Best of luck,
Wally


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Boron"
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 4:17 PM
Subject: Staintune High moutn 94-97 anyone?


> Does anyone out there have a high-mount staintune exhaust
> for the 94-97 that they might be willing to part with? If you do please
> shoot me an email off list at jboron1414@xxxxxx and let me know what
> you would like to get for it. Thanks!
>
> Jeremy
>
_______________________________________________
Vfr mailing list
Vfr@xxxxxx
For subscription and delivery options:
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vfr