no helmets for michigan. what do you think?

Discussion in 'General VFR Discussions' started by badvfr, Nov 10, 2012.

  1. badvfr

    badvfr New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2012
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    my answer is short. ill always wear one, but i would never want the govt to say its required.
     
  2. Expvet

    Expvet New Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Map
    Whether the goverment says do it or not, wearing a helmet is just common sense, as is wearing gear. Required I think is not so much because of safety concerns as for preventing astronomical medical costs for insurance companies due to major head trauma.
     
  3. Rainbow7

    Rainbow7 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    599
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Muslim-free Queensland
    Anything that helps cull Harley owners from the gene pool is a good thing, IMO.
     
  4. 34468 Randy

    34468 Randy Secret Insider

    Country:
    Canada
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    13,660
    Likes Received:
    1,512
    Trophy Points:
    158
    Location:
    Chilliwack, BC Canada
    Map
    I think it should be mandatory. All associated costs pertaiing to the investigation from beginning to end, beit police, insurance or what ever goes up dramatically soon as there is an injury involved vs just vehicle damage. If that accident becomes a fatal, the number of agencies and their associate costs,(which you pay for in taxes and increased premiums) goes up probably 4 or 5 fold. There is no such thing as no victims. Everyone suffers one way or the other.

    Other than for the above mentioned reasons, quite frankly, if I don't know you or your family, I don't really give a rat's ass if your brain juice is running all over the roadway and being licked up by stray dogs. Believe it or not, I have seen that. But not from a biker. A pedestrian. Unfortunately in this particular case, the pedestrian was my friends 14 year old daughter. I had to investigate. I had to do the N.O.K. Impaired driving is another topic another time. I guess, even though I was being paid to attend these, I was one of many victims of that one. As was my wife who went to the morgue and did the identification.
     
  5. vfrcapn

    vfrcapn Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,402
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    53
    Location:
    Grass Valley, CA
    Map
    I always ride 65 but I hate that the government says I must. Kind of like eating salmonella tainted foods, I never do it but I think it's just wrong that the nanny state government dictates we can't have salmonella in our foods.
     
  6. Badbilly

    Badbilly Official VFRWorld Troll Of The Year!

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Messages:
    15,047
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Social Darwinism is alive and well in Detroit.

    Think of all the happy ABATE dudes who are celebrating.

    Think of all the PI lawyers who are expanding thier biz.

    Think of all the jobs for EMT's that are going to be created

    Think about all the harleydoods...Naa I take that back.. Too painful this early in the morning.

    What might be fun is to see if footwear is mandatory whilst riding.
     
  7. SinNH

    SinNH New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2012
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    +1:thumb: They continue to pass more laws that aren't enforced, like the NH sound ordanance, what a joke, the harley Fergusons are louder now than ever. NH has never had a helmet law in my riding days, except for under 18, and I have never rode without one.
     
  8. badvfr

    badvfr New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2012
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My taxes and insurance nor health costs have not risen in the time this law has been repealed. I understand the concept, and that ideal is the reason they justified the lawn in the first place. but in actual practice, i dont see how this would effect costs. It has been an entire season and i have not seen any change.


    ya know, thats kinda the weird thing. when this law changed, i expected all of the squids to be going around without a helmet. I only saw one or two sport bikes with no helmets, it was all of the cruiser guys going around in high traffic areas hoping nobody cut them off. it was unexpected to me.

    i did talk with one guy that said he would in traffic, but on back roads he wouldent wear one. to me this is just as dumb, i have went down on back roads because i hit gravel and my tire spun out from under me. hard to avoid gravel on back roads.
     
  9. badvfr

    badvfr New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2012
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    how do you feel about eye protection being required? i do agree with this one as when i get above 35 my eyes start water bad enough its hard to see, at that point if i cannot see im risking a colllision with someone else inwhich i feel i woudl be responsible and i think this law will protect other drivers from teh riders actions.

    i dont know if the eye protection law has changed or not. hope not.
     
  10. Poligrafovich

    Poligrafovich New Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2011
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Map
    It is far from clear that such laws reduce aggregate health care costs. With very few exceptions, everyone dies exactly once, and people generally incur increased heath care costs as they approach their demise, whatever its cause. Dying earlier does not necessarily mean dying cheaper. Are brain injuries from hitting the pavement bareheaded costlier to treat than years of Alzheimer's? Than decades of heart medication, angioplasties, pacemakers, and bypass operations? On the other hand, people who go from 100% healthy to 100% dead instantly have, as a group, the lowest health care costs of all, and behaviors that increase the odds of this almost certainly reduce, rather than raise, the "costs to society" on which these arguments hinge.

    For the individual, there are other reasons to wear a helmet, and I never ride without mine. But "cost to the collective" statistics only care about keeping you alive so long as your cash flow is positive. In dollars and cents to "society" it's optimal for me to kick the bucket the day my insurance claims, Social Security, Medicare, etc., costs exceed what I pay in taxes or policy premiums, as they will eventually do for most of us.

    I would also encourage motorcyclists to think long and hard before jumping on the bandwagon of prohibiting behavior others enjoy just because "most people" think it's "too dangerous".
     
  11. bitterpil

    bitterpil New Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,379
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Map

    + 1

    However, im wondering if there is any data of non helmet wearing fools...ehem..motorcylists causing injury to others by way of not wearing a helmet.

    Example smacked in the head by a rock or grasshopper for that matter and hitting or hurting another.

    I am not in favor of the gov passing laws to protect people from themselves. I am in favor of laws that prevent one fool from harming an innocent.
     
  12. DaHose

    DaHose New Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,003
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Napa, CA.
    Map
    I agree with many here. I HATE creation of helmet laws but ride with ATGATT.

    Jose
     
  13. davjohns

    davjohns New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2012
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    I broke a helmet while riding dirt bikes as a kid. I am a devoted fan of full face helmets now. Full face because I am concerned about just how ugly my face could get if drug over asphalt. Meanwhile, I agree that government should regulate less. Natural selection will prevail.

    My question is more about the hypocrisy of laws. Michigan requires seat belts, but not helmets? States that do that confuse me. I know there is federal money tied to the seat belt laws. Still, it seems someone would note the disparity.
     
  14. Rainbow7

    Rainbow7 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    599
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Muslim-free Queensland
    Possibly...but what IS absolutely, unarguably clear is that compulsory helmet use saves lives. Now, personally, I don't care if a bunch of Harleydoods off themselves because they think a do-rag is sufficient protection but if my taxes pay for their brain damaged existence should they survive then I believe I have a right to insist that a helmet be worn.
     
  15. ridervfr

    ridervfr Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,894
    Likes Received:
    101
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    South FL
    Map
    Anything that helps cull Harley owners from the gene pool is a good thing, IMO.

    quote wrap didnt work! couldnt have sed it betta! funny shit and heated topic as well. I wont pile on and will refrain from the BS argument aboot health care costs :flip: am in Ft. Meyers FL right now, and I gota say that the HD doodes do rule. No-body is wearing a brain bucket except maybe 3% of the cruisers. Dont really see that many sport bikes or metric cruisers either. When you do see them, some arent wearing a skid-lid. I wear one when I go around the block. Thats just me, like the wife sed, "its and intelligence test." Anywho, its like when I see someone with cigarretes, "smoke em if you got em." you wana crack your melon open, go for it. Darwinian fer sure. :koolaid:
     
  16. Bubba Zanetti

    Bubba Zanetti Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,383
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    53
    Location:
    Delaware
    Map
    I hate how the socialist nanny state government and race track owners make me wear all my gear before I get out on the track. I mean I have a God given constitutional right to wear my skull cap and jock strap only out on the track if thats all I want to wear.

    I have said it before and I'll say it again, what irks me in these threads is they are completely fucking illogical. The so called socialist nanny state tells you and me to do shit everyday that really has no logic. But the requirement to wear a helmet is somehow a big deal? The fact eye protection was brought up as a possible requirement due to responsibility to others shows this. So your going down the road and can't see shit because your are not wearing eye protection and crash into a family and kill people so "hey, we should have a eye protection law" But when you get smacked in the head by a robin at 60 mph, not wearing a helmet, this is somehow different? This actually happened to a friend of mine who thank God was wearing a helmet and it rang his bell something awful. Without a helmet who knows what would have happened.

    Motorcycling is inherently dangerous and the injuries when people crash on the street are horrific. The only thing that separates you from the road is your gear.

    I don't care if the government say yes or no to helmets as I always wear mine. But to somehow think its some great infringement on freedom is again fucking illogical in the extreme. Much like blaming President Obama for all of our current ills as a nation. Got news for ya, these problems have been manifesting themselves for years and sorry to break it to you folks, but Obama is just another in a long line of Presidents who haven't handled the situation well. The blame list is a bit longer.

    Ok, BZ is off his soapbox.
     
  17. Bubba Zanetti

    Bubba Zanetti Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,383
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    53
    Location:
    Delaware
    Map
    We have a winner! Thank you for picking a easy one regarding the socialist nanny state and what they tell us to do.

    By the way, any of you really study what the seatbelt laws were created?

    BZ
     
  18. Bubba Zanetti

    Bubba Zanetti Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,383
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    53
    Location:
    Delaware
    Map
    As a complete side note, you know why the insurance companies don't usually fight to repeal the absence of helmet laws (this varies by State and the laws within that govern insure complies and policies)?

    Since going down on the road 50% at intersections, the other 40% in curves, none helmet wearers usually die which makes the total insurance payout cheaper! Unlike when you are a veggie in the hospital and you have to have your family decide to yank the plug after 10 years on life support because the real socialist nanny state has intervened overriding your decision or families decision to yank the plug. Even though your living will clearly makes such request.

    Thats the fucking socialist many state boys and girls.

    An insurance lobbyist informed me why they don't usually fight the helmet laws being repealed.

    BZ
     
  19. badvfr

    badvfr New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2012
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    that is a good point. perhaps it would be good to have a law stating helmets are required above certain speeds where such an event coudl be fatal to other people would be in order. as iv said before, i am only for laws that effect other people. although, it will be some time before this law will be able to be changed again.
     
  20. badvfr

    badvfr New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2012
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think the point that some are trying to make is that it doesn't actually cost you money. Your taxes do not pay for the care. at least in michigan vehicle insurance is required which includes health coverage for an accident. and as bz said, you are more likely to survive as a veggie with a helmet and more likely to die instantly without one.

    or rather as it would be in the more average bad accident, break a few limbs with a helmet, die without one.

    confuses me why people chose to go in traffic without one.
     
Related Topics

Share This Page